Abstract:

Air quality problems in Asian cities are direct consequences of the rapid growth in motorization. Transport planning with an exclusive focus on motorized traffic appears to have also strong detrimental effects on accessibility, safety, health and livability of cities. Poor people are suffering disproportionably from these adverse effects.
The bicycle has high potential to contribute to (the solution of) urban mobility (problems) and also to contribute to the quality of life. Cycling as a mode of transport fits very well in a modern sustainable urban traffic and transport system. In particular the Dutch experience showcases cycling as a viable means of transport for well to do people in wealthy countries.

In order to capitalize on this potential, a comprehensive traffic and transport policy is required that defines the desired role of cycling in the total transport system. This role has to be seen in relation to the role of other modes like private cars, public transport and walking. Each mode has its strengths and weaknesses. The task for traffic planners is to meet the transport needs of individuals and society in such a way that the positive characteristics of each mode can contribute to social and economical well being, and that alternatives are being offered for those situations in which the use of a certain mode is problematic.

I-ce developed the Bicycle Partnership Program which will be integrated in Asia with the Sustainable Urban Mobility in Asia program by CAI-Asia. The program will support cities and civil society organizations in their ambition towards cycling-inclusive city and transport planning, in 2007-2010.

Presentation: http://www.cleanairnet.org/baq2006/1757/docs/SW29_4.ppt